By
Matthew Daly
April 18, 2003
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Bush
administration is quietly reshaping environmental policy to expand logging and
other development by settling a series of lawsuits, many of them filed by
industry groups.
As a result of settlements, the administration has
announced plans to remove wilderness protections for millions of acres in Utah,
has agreed to review protections for endangered species such as salmon and the
northern spotted owl, has reversed a Clinton-era ban on snowmobiles in
Yellowstone and Grand Teton national parks and has softened rules on logging.
None of the decisions were subject to prior public
comment or congressional approval.
"I don't know if it's a policy, but it's
definitely a pattern," said Kristen Boyles, a lawyer for the environmental
group Earthjustice who has frequently battled the Bush administration in court.
"The industry sues and then the current
administration does a poor job of defending itself or comes to a sweetheart
settlement," Boyles said.
Critics call it "sue and settle," leaving
few fingerprints as officials move to roll back environmental protections.
Last month, several environmental groups filed a
federal lawsuit claiming the administration and the timber industry have been
holding secret talks to undermine the Northwest Forest Plan. The suit seeks
access to settlement documents under the Freedom of Information Act.
Mark Rey, the Agriculture undersecretary who directs
forest policy, denies any attempt to orchestrate legal challenges.
"No litigation is friendly," he said.
But critics suggest the administration is using the
lawsuit settlements as an end-run around Congress, which has blocked some parts
of the Bush agenda, including efforts to open Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife
Refuge to oil drilling and the Healthy Forests Initiative, which would increase
logging in national forests to reduce the risk of wildfires.
"In the guise of settling lawsuits, federal
officials have retired to the back room to work out deals that sacrifice our
old-growth forests, salmon and clean water for the sake of clearcutting our
public lands," said Patti Goldman of Earthjustice, one of the plaintiffs
in the freedom of information case.
In recent weeks, the administration has settled
several industry challenges to the Northwest Forest Plan, which governs logging
and habitat protection for salmon and other threatened species. Among other
actions, the government agreed to review Endangered Species Act protections for
the northern spotted owl and marbled murrelet, birds that are icons of the
Northwest timber wars. In a separate action, officials have proposed weakening
some salmon protections to boost logging.
The National Park Service also has allowed
snowmobiles in Yellowstone and Grand Teton national parks, and the Agriculture
Department declined to defend the "roadless" rule, a Clinton-era
policy that blocks road-building in remote forest areas.
Last week, the Interior Department announced that in
response to a lawsuit it intends to halt all reviews of its Western land
holdings for new wilderness protection and to withdraw that protected status
from some 3 million acres in Utah. That settlement was approved by a federal
judge on Monday, three days after it was filed.
Rey, a former timber industry lobbyist, said
officials are doing nothing the Clinton administration didn't do in the 1990s.
"I understand why they're unhappy," Rey
said of critics, "but their unhappiness needs to be measured in balance to
the situation they enjoyed when people who agreed with them more often than not
were in this position."
Rey said the Clinton administration encouraged
friendly suits from environmentalists to block logging in Northwest forests,
prevent road-building and stop development on vast wilderness areas controlled
by the Bureau of Land Management.
Environmentalists deny that claim.
"I do not know of any instance where the Clinton
administration said, 'You sue us, and we'll settle and we'll stop a timber
sale.' It hasn't happened in this office," said Boyles of Earthjustice.
Each of the settlements the Bush administration
agrees to is presented to a judge and will be subject to public comment. Rey
said they will be judged on their merits.
"Nobody gets frozen out of our actions because
the public ultimately is going to get a chance to comment. If they are
dissatisfied, they will get their own opportunity to sue," Rey said.
But environmental groups call the comment period a
formality, which rarely produces any substantive change in the settlement.
Chris West of the American Forest Resource Council, a
Portland, Ore.-based timber group which has filed several of the lawsuits,
denied any collusion in the litigation.
He said Bush is "just trying to put some balance
into how these forests are managed," noting that logging in the Northwest
has dropped in the past decade to less than a third of the volume recommended
by the Northwest Forest Plan.